Posts Tagged ‘obama eligibility’

Day 1317 of the Usurpation – British National Archives Reveal…

August 27, 2012

British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya

“…But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the Archives using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in 1961. Since the POS in the White House is the only known son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when Kenya became officially independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us to conclude that the POS is that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya in 1961. And in fact, the claimed birth date of the POS is August 4, 1961…”

Now it gets curiouser and curiouser…

” According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958…However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year…”
“…Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa…”

So this begs the question; was Hillary Clinton there to see for herself (it has been long speculated that the Clintons knew Obama’s secret), or was she there to assist in the coverup and see that the record was expunged?

h/t Fellowship of the Minds

The complete article can be found at above link; essential reading.

‎”It’s in the archives..it actually exists…written down…”: Abercrombie – Day 729

January 20, 2011

“It’s in the archives..it actually exists…written down…”; says HI Gov Abercrombie, who has vowed to get to the bottom of the Obie eligibility kerfuffle. Key here is what he doesn’t say; long form or no form. Oh, but it’s written down. That certainly clears the air! But I’m just a “birther”, so what do I know? Curiouser and curiouser!

New York Daily News (Jan 19, 2011)

Eligibility Questions Now Focused on Obama Paternity/Maternity: Day 384

February 8, 2010

Author and investigator Jack Cashill (he who plumbed the depths of Obama’s “Dreams of My Father” and detected the hand of Bill Ayers) has come up with an interesting new theory about the origins of Barack Hussein “Steve”* Obama. His conclusion: that Obama’s biological father may be his putative grandfather Stanley Dunham and his mother, get this, Dunham’s black mistress. Cashill begins:

The murky circumstances of Obama’s birth invite attempts to make the known facts fit together. This article was prompted by two e-mails. The first asked me why I had never weighed in on the birth certificate controversy surrounding President Barack Obama.

I responded that although I was troubled by the lack of documentation regarding all phases of Obama’s history — I’d be content with his SAT scores — I could not understand why any pregnant American woman would go anywhere near Kenya.
The second e-mail was more interesting. It came from a Michigan entrepreneur named Don Wilkie, with whom I had not previously communicated. Knowing my interest in the authorship questions surrounding Obama’s writing, he presumed that I was intrigued as he was by a cryptic poem the nineteen-year old Obama wrote called “Pop,” the best thing that Obama himself has actually written.  He was right.
“Pop” relates an encounter between Obama and a man most reviewers presume to be Obama’s maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham. Dunham would have been in his early sixties at the time. In the poem, Obama has “Pop” wondering drunkenly about the boy, “What to do with me, a green young man.”
The Obama of the poem is cynical, even a little bitter. He makes several allusions to the fact that he and the old man look and even smell alike, a fact that strikes Obama as more ironic than reassuring. The poem ends, however, with reconciliation when Pop stands and asks for a hug. Writes Obama:

I see my face, framed within
Pop’s black-framed glasses

And know he’s laughing too.

Wilkie offers a novel interpretation of “Pop.” Says Wilkie, “I think the poem zeros in on that poignant moment when Obama was told that his grandfather was in reality his father.”

Wilkie concedes his theory is “off-the-wall,” but he also offers photographic evidence to show that Obama much more closely resembles Dunham — especially by the telltale ears — than he does Barack Obama, Sr…..(rest of story at link below)

Source: American Thinker

h/t The Post & Email

*”But in the spirit of full disclosure, there are a few October surprises you’ll be finding out about in the coming weeks. First of all, my middle name is not what you think. It’s actually Steve. That’s right. Barack Steve Obama.”

(from remarks at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner; October 2008; video at 1:20)

“Birthers” Just Won’t Go Away: Day 188-July 28, 2009

July 28, 2009

Reporter Bill: Robert, I hate to bring this up but someone has to…
Gibbs: Uh Oh
R. Is there anything you can say that will make the “birthers” go away?
G. No!….that’s the God’s honest truth

Hawaii official asserts, again, that he has seen the original document that confirms Obama’s birthplace as Honolulu, and that he “is a natural born citizen”.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”

Robert Gibbs,White House liar-in-chief keeps on giving:

Dr. Alan Keyes

Dr. Alan Keyes

Eligibility Movement About Love Not Hate: Day 43 – March2, 2009

March 2, 2009

….that’s Love as in Love of Country and Reverence for Our Constitution, NOT Hatred for Barack Obama. The Left is attempting to smear those concerned about Obama’s eligibility as irrational conspiracy theorists. They are So Wrong! The Issue is not going away; Today’s AOL and Politico Headline the story…

AOL News: The Birthers Continue to Hound Obama
The Politico: Culture of Conspiracy. The Birthers

At The Politico Ben Smith writes:

Out of the gaze of the mainstream and even the conservative media is a flourishing culture of advocates, theorists and lawyers, all devoted to proving that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president of the United States…..The challenges to Obama’s eligibility have no grounding in evidence. Courts across the country have summarily rejected the movement’s theory — that Obama can’t be a citizen because his father wasn’t —as a misreading of U.S. law; and Hawaii officials, along with contemporary birth announcements, affirm that Obama was in fact born in Honolulu in 1961.

The issue is hardly out of the gaze of the mainstream…media, it has been in plain sight all along. But the mainstream, and most of the conservative, media have chosen to ignore the most severe constitutional crisis since the Civil War. We must mark 2008 as the year journalism in the United States died. The press has become, in the words of Leo Donofrio, The Propaganda Ponies of the Fourth Estate.

At the time of his birth, Obama was a British/Kenyan citizen by descent of his father. Because I pointed out pesky international laws which governed his citizenship due to the fact that a father has every legal right in the world to have the laws of his nation apply to his son, I have been labeled a conspiracy freakoid of nature.

Never mind that I included demands for Panama John McCain and the Nicaraguan born Roger Calero to also be removed from our ballots. No, they don’t want to talk about that do they – because it would blow the “he’s just another Obama hater” mantra clear out of play. (see Natural Born Citizen)

So much for the mainstream media.Most of the conservative media will not touch the eligibility issue because they fear being smeared as kooks and nut cases. Some Republicans are so desperate to find a suitable candidate to revive the party’s fortunes that they wish the natural born citizen requirement would go away so they can nominate a non natural born citizen; i.e. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal; born of Indian immigrant parents who naturalized after his birth. Governor Schwarzenegger, who would love to be President, at least had the good sense to acknowledge that he is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible unless, and until, a constitutional amendment is passed negating the natural born citizen requirement of our Presidents.

The eligibility issue did come up, albeit briefly, at the past weekend’s CPAC gathering in Washington. Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media:

Judging by the applause, a large portion of the audience was not outraged by the remarks.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President...and the President before taking office swears the following oath…“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” (U.S.Constitution, Article II, Section 2)

Barack Obama taking oath; Michelle Obama holding Lincoln bible..

Barack Obama taking oath; Michelle Obama holding Lincoln bible..

The Alleged Usurper by Alan Keyes: Day 34 – Feb 22, ’09

February 22, 2009

Three time Presidential candidate Alan Keyes gets right to the point in this video calling Barack Obama “a radical communist, an abomination, an alleged usurper who is occupying that office without the constitutional authority to do so….who is going to destroy this country…we are either going to stop him or the United States is going to cease to exist…”


h/t Count Us Out

Also see Manly’s Republic

A dispatch from Cullman, Alabama:

..(A) local resident asked Alabama Senator Richard] Shelby if there was any truth to a rumor that appeared during the presidential campaign concerning Obama’s U.S. citizenship, or lack thereof.
“Well his father was Kenyan and they said he was born in Hawaii, but I haven’t seen any birth certificate,” Shelby said. “You have to be born in America to be president.”

Well, he had many a chance to speak out but, like so many others who know, he did not. (see, Those Who Know, Day 28)

h/t Pat Dollard

Dr. Alan Keyes

Dr. Alan Keyes

Eligibility Issue Ignored by Those Who Know: Day 28 – Feb 16, 2009

February 19, 2009

Who else knows about the Barack Obama ineligibility besides Obama himself? There are many influential people in media and politics who know, or at least believe that Obama is not constitutionally qualified for President. These people, and I will name a few, will not touch the issue: The list most prominently features Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity,Mark Levin, Ron Paul, and possibly the Clintons. Why?

Let’s start with Obama who knew, as a self-professed constitutional scholar that he was not eligible. His own campaign website acknowledged his dual citizenship. Then, there are the stories about his Indonesian citizenship:

An investigation into Indonesian citizenship law and a review of Obama’s biography and travels suggest the Illinois senator at one point may have been a citizen of Indonesia. That would not necessarily disqualify Obama to run for president, but it could raise loyalty concerns.

As for Limbaugh, Hannity, and others J.R.Dieckmann at Renew America writes:

… talk radio commentators are afraid to talk about it. Rush Limbaugh stated that he is not sure if it “passes the smell test,” and Sean Hannity has not even mentioned it as far as I know except when a caller brought it up. Hannity remarked that he didn’t know enough about it and moved to another topic.

Hannity may be restricted by his bosses, but Rush is the CEO of his own broadcasting network and has nothing to fear except the possible loss of some of his franchise radio stations across the country which carry his show. Rush is known for facing down any amount of political pressure or politician so he must have his own reasons for not giving it credibility on the air. Privately, I suspect Limbaugh takes this matter very seriously but he has two relatives on the bench; Stephen N. Limbaugh, Sr., Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. and other friends who may have advised him to avoid the subject until the issue is officially in the hands of the courts.

Turning to Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) we find an in depth article about his reluctance to speak out at Citizen Wells blog:

There are several reasons why Obama is not eligible to be president.
However, most if not all congressmen were aware of numerous lawsuits
challenging Obama’s eligibility beginning with Philip Berg’s on
August 21, 2008. Many mistakenly stated that the lawsuits were
dismissed for lack of merit. That is patently false. However, since
the congressmen were aware of the lawsuits, they were also aware
that obama had employed an army of attorneys and spent enormous
amounts of resources to avoid proving that he was eligible.

That is the real smoking gun.

This is the reason that minimally, Congress should have demanded that
Obama prove that he was qualified. A single congressman could have
initiated this query before or when Congress convened to certify the
Electoral votes.

Not a single congressman stepped forward.

Congressman Ron Paul knew that there were serious issues surrounding
Obama’s eligibility. Congressman Ron Paul, who speaks of upholding
the US Constitution.

Late in December of 2008, Congressman Paul was asked if he would
challenge the Electoral votes in Congress. Here is his response:

“If I did that, I would be laughed out of Congress.”

I believe Congressman Paul’s response is typical of the position
of the entire Congress. However, Mr. Paul, we expected more from
you.

Ron Paul on Patriotism

Ron Paul on Patriotism

We conclude with a quote for the day; this one from Citizen Wells on Twitter:

“Technically Obama will not have to be impeached since he will not be president.

Standard prosecution should suffice.”

Obama Eligibility Taboo in Media

It’s Not Only Republicans Enraged : DAY 27 – FEBRUARY 15, 2009

February 16, 2009

Reader Ted wrote yesterday:

Obama’s stealing the census from Congress has suddenly awakened and enraged the Republicans. Maybe this will arouse them as well to challenge Obama for stealing the Presidency itself. They surely know he is not an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (which is more than merely being a 14th Amendment “citizen”) by virtue of either Obama’s birth to a dad of Kenyan/British citizenship or birth in Kenya itself — as manifested by his unwillingness to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal.

We’re not all that certain about general Republican outrage but at least in The Congress the resistance to the Porkulus Bill was an indication of something approaching that condition. Certainly, conservatives across American are outraged by the betrayal of our Constitution that the present usurpation represents.The damage to the nation by the actions of this administration and The Congress is incalculable.

If allowed to stand the harm would take decades to undo, if indeed, it could be undone at all. The only solution left to patriotic Americans is to intensify the campaign to expose the fraud which leaves us with a usurper in the White House. Only exposure of the fraud, removal of the usurper, and the consequent nullification of all his actions will repair the damage. Perhaps there is hope, read on...

A new idea put forth yesterday is to convene a National Grand Jury ; its mission would be in part…

…. review and evaluate procedures, methods and systems used by federal governmental agencies to determine whether they comply with the stated objectives of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America as properly amended.

The National Grand Jury shall review the officers of the federal government to determine whether they are constitutionally qualified to hold office, and to determine if their actions and behavior are consistent with stated objectives of the Declaration of Independence, Constitution for the United States of America as properly amended, and the criminal law as recognized in any of the several states.

In a Jan 22, 2009 article Attorney Leo C. Donofrio discusses the history of the Federal Grand Jury System (The Grand Jury is the Fourth Branch of Government). The wonderful Federal Grand Jury system, created within the Fifth Amendment was a valuable tool for the citizens to exercise a check on their government and its functionaries and officers. However, the system was subverted in 1946 by a little little noticed change in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP) which attempted to “eliminate”,,..(excerpts from Donofrio follow)

The Constitutional power of “we the people” sitting as grand jurors…. Regardless, the power I am going to explain to you still exists in the Constitution, and has been upheld by the United States Supreme Court despite the intention of the legislature and other legal scholars to make our power disappear with a cheap magic trick…..

So, it’s clear that the Constitution intended to give the grand jury power to instigate criminal charges, and this was especially true when it came to government oversight. But something strange happened on the way to the present. That power was eroded by a lie enacted by the legislative branch. The 5th Amendment to the Constitution still contains the same words quoted above, but if you sit on a grand jury and return a “presentment” today, the prosecutor must sign it or it probably won’t be allowed to stand by the judge and the criminal charges you have brought to the court’s attention will be swept away. And the reason for this can be found in a legislative lie of epic proportions…..

The use of presentments had become obsolete because the grand jurors were not aware of their power. So the use of “presentments” became more and more rare, and then in 1946 the legislative branch seized upon the moment to make this power disappear by waving its magic wand over the Constitution…..

I submit to you that this (an Antonin Scalia opinion) sets the stage for a revolutionary new context necessary and Constitutionally mandated to “we the people”, THE FOURTH BRANCH of the Government of the United States. Besides, the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches, I submit that there is a fourth branch, THE GRAND JURY, and “we the people” when sitting as grand jurors, are, as Scalia quoted in US v. Williams, ” a constitutional fixture in its own right”. Yes, damn it. That is exactly what the grand jury is, and what it was always intended to be…..

Donofrio concludes with:

The law is on our side. So please spread this knowledge as far and wide as you can. We the people have the right and power under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to charge this government with crimes by returning presentments regardless of whether the US Attorneys or the federal judges agree with us. As the Supreme Court has so brilliantly stated, we are the “buffer between the Government and the people.”

National Grand Jury?


Congress & SCOTUS Fraud Complicit: Day 23 – February 11, 2009

February 12, 2009

Obama and McCain Both Constitutionally Ineligible. Precedent Set by Allowing Obama Usurpation Will Plague Nation’s Future. The People Must Act to Restore Our Constitution. Obama Must Be Exposed!

Today’s post is a letter from blogger Zapem in response to yesterday’s (Day 22) post

It’s too bad that World Net Daily doesn’t do an article on the actual history of S.R. 511. It shows the people the truth about the unconstitutional agenda at work here.

Attorney Mario Apuzzo makes the argument that the Senate investigated John McCain, but not Barack Obama and asks the question why.

I ask the question why they were allowed to get away with what they did when the bill McCaskill (and co-sponsored by Obama, Clinton, etc.) FIRST sponsored, S. 2678, failed. It failed because NO ONE can legislate a single person’s born status, that’s why it failed. The follow-up done 5 weeks later that they tried to pull, with S.R. 511 was not a law, but the media presented it to the public as if it was a law and that’s corruption, plain and simple. It was a lie and a very BOLD lie at that. We’ve proven that much.

The bottom line is, the Senate, the Congress, and Obama and McCain themselves , all knew early on that neither were eligible to run for POTUS. The entire activity in the Senate proves that there was an attempt to circumvent the constitution. It further proves that if McCain was eligible there would have been no need to try to legislate him into an eligible status. The truth is, there was a reason and that reason was, he wasn’t eligible.

Furthermore, S.R. 511 tries to say that McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone. McCain’s long form birth certificate proves he was not. That makes S.R. 511 moot as it contends he was born in one place and his actual certificate says he was born in another. This presents an even further problem for Obama. It shows that what’s on a short-form birth certificate isn’t always what is found in the details that can only be provided on the long-form birth certificate. We see that contradiction with McCain’s birth certificates. What we haven’t seen are Obama’s birth certificates. A certification is not a certificate and it certainly doesn’t contain the details a long-form certificate does as was proven with with John McCain.

Obama claims he’s entitled to hide them. The constitution claims he is not. The U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t know what to do and is passing the buck every chance they get for fear of the scandal it would cause. A scandal, because if you look into the history of what congress was doing to covering this up, how much faith would the country have in their elected leaders? How much faith would the rest of the world have knowing said corruption exists? It’s either true or it isn’t true what they have done.

The biggest cover up lies with the officials in Hawaii. They are the ones perpetuating a lie and they know it. But when the truth comes out, and it will, they will be held responsible as well as the congress.

This is not going to go away, even if the media plays chicken little like the courts have. The people should be outraged. While it may put their favorite sweet-talker in the office today, what are they going to say when the same thing is pulled tomorrow and they don’t like that guy? All of a sudden, they will want to cling to their Constitution, which has now been usurped. Do they even understand what type of precedent has been set? That a mere website called Factcheck can dictate who is eligible to run the entire country? It’s absurd!

I intend on telling them they should have thought about their Constitution when they were happily believing that circumventing it was the way to go because they were partisan blind. Circumventing the Constitution leaves the people with no rights, just as we have seen with these bailouts that are bankrupting the country. They aren’t listening to the people because the people aren’t listening to their Constitution. And that’s the only thing that will save them from a corrupted government that intended to cheat them no matter who they voted for. Both John McCain and Barack Obama engaged in unconstitutional and illegal behavior and they know it. So did the people who perpetuated this lie.

This is not over. Not by a long shot. As much as they’d like to keep sweeping it under the carpet and robbing the people like they are right now. Perhaps the people are blind and stupid to the facts. But when they have no money left at all, then they might see it. They’ve been warned. All they have to do is go back and look at the record because the media isn’t going to do it for them and the courts can’t be bothered.
Link to Zapem blog

Congress-SCOTUS Fraud Complicit

Oath of Office Mangled: Day 2- Jan 21, 2009

January 21, 2009

Chief Justice Roberts Administers Oath of Office

Chief Justice Roberts Administers Oath of Office

Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Isn’t it odd that this most solemn of oaths was administered in a such a casual, haphazard, and cavalier way. A commenter on Natural Born Citizen today says: (transcript and video at Slate.com)

The Oath administered was incorrectly stated by both Chief Justice Roberts and Obama and is no where in the Constitution. What does this mean? Did Chief Justice do this on purpose fully knowing that Obama is the UIC (Usurper in Chief)?

Did he do this to absolve himself of administering a perjured oath so that he can allow this fictitious usurper to get it and then remove him when evidence is shown that he does not qualify as a natural born citizen under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5?

Attorney Leo C. Donofrio, a courageous defender of the Constitution and in the forefront of the Obama eligibility litigation, said today regarding the Inauguration business (Natural Born Citizen):

….As for the inauguration, I couldn’t help but wonder why they didn’t swear Obama in before noon as is required by law. And the butchering of the oath of office was absolutely surreal having listened to it on the radio live in my car.

But all I really want to say at this point in time is that I pray Obama feels a genuine sense of humility for the incredible faith people have put in him. Now that he’s in the office, I hope he does good things with the power and that it humbles him. I’m very happy for the African American community as well. While I will never believe Obama (or McCain) were eligible under the Constitution, I do believe this event will empower and heal some wounds from the blight of slavery.

I fought for the Constitution. I lost. I hope the Constitution wins in the end. Please be a good President Mr. Obama. God knows we need one. Peace to all….

Obama Sworn In

Obama Sworn In