Obama Disappoints: Day 17 – February 5, 2009

An interesting article on the vetting, actually the non-vetting, of Obama appeared on the Ahrcanum blog today (excerpts below): (see our previous post 2/4/09):

“Why would the American voters expect the vetting of his selections to be any different than Obama’s own vetting?…I know more about Rush Limbaugh’s success and failures than Obama’s. Too bad for Joe the Plumber who got a full vetting in public….Are we supposed to believe in all those government agencies working together to prevent terrorism when we have a leader who’s team can’t even vett or nominate someone without tax problems?”

“Obama has come out smelling like a rose en route the The Presidency even though his own vetting left a lot to be desired. No one still has seen his official birth certificate even after numerous lawsuits by Berg, Donofrio and others. Obama’s selective service documents are out of alignment with the truth. Where is his report card and transcripts? Really, why would the American voters expect the vetting of his selections to be any different than Obama’s own vetting?”

(links above added, not in original)

Speaking of Tax Problems there is a video composite about the Obama administration’s tax shenanigans over at Habits Not Peculiar:

Taxation: Voluntary and Patriotic

Obama Disappoints


Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Obama Disappoints: Day 17 – February 5, 2009”

  1. Heavy Says:

    How did the American public succomb to this overt terrorism?

    The ONE will be stopped…By any means necessary.

  2. Ted Says:

    DEAR READER, before Obama has a chance further to “STIMULATE” GOVERNMENT growth, so as further to DEPRESS ECONOMIC freedom and liberty (by his effort to drive our RECESSION into DEPRESSION as pretext for FURTHER government control), it is essential NOW that both the United States Supreme Court AND Military Joint Chiefs of Staff EXERCISE WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM THE INTERNAL THREAT OF USURPATION. OBAMA’S STEADFAST REFUSAL TO OVERCOME “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” on the issue of either his Kenyan birth and/or Kenyan/British father’s citizenship — by his steadfast refusal to supply his long form birth certificate under seal (compounded by his internet posting of a fake “after-the-fact” short form ‘certificate’) — renders him INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment “citizen” is not enough. A “President” MUST BE an Article 2 “natural born citizen” AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

  3. Ted Says:

    Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, have confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The question of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited “after-the-fact” short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment “citizen” is not sufficient. A “President” MUST BE an Article 2 “natural born citizen” AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

  4. ahrcanum Says:

    Thanks for the props! Glad you liked it.

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: