Q. Who Vetted Obama? A. The Internet: Day 16 – February 4, 2009

With adroit use of charm, subtle hustle, and knowledge of constitutional law, B.H. Obama has managed to evade any scrutiny by various state authorities (i.e. election officials), the national Democratic Party apparatus, and even the United States Supreme Court. Michael Bresciani writes today at Renew America:

It was not the Supreme Court that vetted Obama, not the state courts, not the election commissions, not the attorneys general, not the legislature, not the DNC and not the Hawaii Office of Vital Statistics. Just who did vet Barack Obama? You guessed it, the internet!… The document Obama and the DNC offered which is now alleged to be fraudulent was posted only to the internet…. Nothing significant about Obama’s past has ever gone beyond the internet.

Just when all hope seems gone the tide has begun to change. Obama’s naiveté in foreign affairs is looking more Carter-ish and his ability to swing votes in the bailout battle makes him look weak at home or at the least too inexperienced as many have sagely warned.

Then along comes Guantanamo judge Col. James L. Pohl who recently rejected the president’s request to halt the proceedings of the military tribunal being conducted to prosecute terrorism suspects. Kudos to the Colonel! Maybe he will embolden the squeamish Supremes and other judges to re-think their refusals to let the matter be answered once and for all.

Until Obama offers more than an internet vetting of his documents those who are now forced to air their grievances and questions only on the web should not be the least bit dismayed. They are doing no better or worse than Barack Obama even without the msm and an entourage of entranced worshippers.

Read the entire article here.

h/t The Steady Drip

Who Vetted Obama?

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Q. Who Vetted Obama? A. The Internet: Day 16 – February 4, 2009”

  1. Obama Disappoints: Day 17 - February 5, 2009 « The Usurpation Chronicles Says:

    […] The Usurpation Chronicles « Q. Who Vetted Obama? A. The Internet: Day 16 – February 4, 2009 […]

  2. Ted Says:

    DEAR READER, before Obama has a chance further to “STIMULATE” GOVERNMENT growth, so as further to DEPRESS ECONOMIC freedom and liberty (by his effort to drive our RECESSION into DEPRESSION as pretext for FURTHER government control), it is essential NOW that both the United States Supreme Court AND Military Joint Chiefs of Staff EXERCISE WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM THE INTERNAL THREAT OF USURPATION. OBAMA’S STEADFAST REFUSAL TO OVERCOME “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” on the issue of either his Kenyan birth and/or Kenyan/British father’s citizenship — by his steadfast refusal to supply his long form birth certificate under seal (compounded by his internet posting of a fake “after-the-fact” short form ‘certificate’) — renders him INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment “citizen” is not enough. A “President” MUST BE an Article 2 “natural born citizen” AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: