More Questions About Soetero-Obama…..Day 9, January 28, 2009

Soetero-Obama Meets Privately with Eight Supreme Court Justices While Controversy Swirls Around His Eligibility and Cases Pending Before the Court

What did Soetero-Obama tell the Supreme Court?

(World Net Daily – Jan 27, 2009 Bob Unruh)

Proof Obama went by Barry Soetoro at Occidental

Posted by David Crockett at The Betrayal (Jan 28,’09)

WILL THE MILITARY SERVE OBAMA IF HE CANNOT PROVE HIS ELIGBILITY FOR POTUS?

When asked how they feel about President-elect Barack Obama as commander in chief, six out of 10 active-duty service members say they are uncertain or pessimistic, according to a Military Times survey.

In follow-up interviews, respondents expressed concerns about Obama’s lack of military service and experience leading men and women in uniform.

“Being that the Marine Corps can be sent anywhere in the world with the snap of his fingers, nobody has confidence in this guy as commander in chief,” said one lance corporal who asked not to be identified.

The writer at Hillary and Me blog says:

Here’s my question.

What happens if you serve in the military and believe that Obama is not legitimately POTUS . . . that he is a usurper or worse? You are sworn to uphold the Constitution of our Republic. Your obligation & loyalty is to the country and not to any individual man or woman.

Further, is there any possibility that the military would consider/or act on removing a person that has fraudulently obtained the office and is ineligible? I would not want to be faced with this dilemma.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “More Questions About Soetero-Obama…..Day 9, January 28, 2009”

  1. Ted Says:

    Obama says his “recovery plan will include UNPRECEDENTED measures that will allow the American people to hold [his] administration ACCOUNTABLE” yet Obama refuses to be held ACCOUNTABLE to the same American people for his UNPRECEDENTED refusal to show his actual birth certificate.

  2. Ted Says:

    If SCOTUS is doing nothing at this point, I can proffer only four explanations (since it is SOOOOO patently obvious that BHO is not eligible to be POTUS under the Constitution’s Article 2 — and surely SCOTUS must know this):

    First, personal coercion — death or other harm threatened on a Judge or family member. (I must really discount this possibility.)

    Second, bribery with money or something akin. (I must discount this possibility as well.)

    Third, a nuclear device or something akin is set to go off in the USA by an enemy or terrorist if the Court were to proceed with an Obama eligibility case. (Perhaps, I’d ask, would this have seemed any crazier and complex than commercial jet liners simultaneously crashing into both Twin Towers, and, as originally planned, the US Capitol and White House and/or Pentagon? Think about it.)

    Fourth, the Court really does feel that no person or persons have legal standing, meaning to me that it must be a criminal case, meaning to me that they’re waiting for an indictment against BHO and possibly others — and then a criminal corruption case will proceed on behalf of all the people of the USA. (I’m hoping it’s this fourth possibility.)

  3. Ted Says:

    OK, OK, OK, enough already, I can’t take any more hoaxes: First we have Al Gore’s global warming, next comes Obama being a constitutionally qualified President, followed by Obama’s stimulus plan, but now we have Robert Reich telling us why we need stronger unions. Are we heading for Saturday Night Live 24/7?

  4. Ted Says:

    The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/29/AR2009012902021.html?wprss=rss_nation

  5. First Military Refusal? Day 10 - January 29, 2009 « The Usurpation Chronicles Says:

    […] The Usurpation Chronicles « More Questions About Soetero-Obama…..Day 9, January 28, 2009 […]

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: