Day 891 – Senator Durbin Says an Illegal Alien Could (someday?) be President; Huh!

Given the Obama birth certificate forgery and other deceptions there is a good chance there is an illegal alien in the oval office already!

More about the forged Obama birth certificate:

h/t Citizen Wells

‎”It’s in the archives..it actually exists…written down…”: Abercrombie – Day 729

‎

“It’s in the archives..it actually exists…written down…”; says HI Gov Abercrombie, who has vowed to get to the bottom of the Obie eligibility kerfuffle. Key here is what he doesn’t say; long form or no form. Oh, but it’s written down. That certainly clears the air! But I’m just a “birther”, so what do I know? Curiouser and curiouser!

New York Daily News (Jan 19, 2011)

Eligibility Questions Now Focused on Obama Paternity/Maternity: Day 384

Author and investigator Jack Cashill (he who plumbed the depths of Obama’s “Dreams of My Father” and detected the hand of Bill Ayers) has come up with an interesting new theory about the origins of Barack Hussein “Steve”* Obama. His conclusion: that Obama’s biological father may be his putative grandfather Stanley Dunham and his mother, get this, Dunham’s black mistress. Cashill begins:

The murky circumstances of Obama’s birth invite attempts to make the known facts fit together. This article was prompted by two e-mails. The first asked me why I had never weighed in on the birth certificate controversy surrounding President Barack Obama.

I responded that although I was troubled by the lack of documentation regarding all phases of Obama’s history — I’d be content with his SAT scores — I could not understand why any pregnant American woman would go anywhere near Kenya.

The second e-mail was more interesting. It came from a Michigan entrepreneur named Don Wilkie, with whom I had not previously communicated. Knowing my interest in the authorship questions surrounding Obama’s writing, he presumed that I was intrigued as he was by a cryptic poem the nineteen-year old Obama wrote called “Pop,” the best thing that Obama himself has actually written.  He was right.

“Pop” relates an encounter between Obama and a man most reviewers presume to be Obama’s maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham. Dunham would have been in his early sixties at the time. In the poem, Obama has “Pop” wondering drunkenly about the boy, “What to do with me, a green young man.”

The Obama of the poem is cynical, even a little bitter. He makes several allusions to the fact that he and the old man look and even smell alike, a fact that strikes Obama as more ironic than reassuring. The poem ends, however, with reconciliation when Pop stands and asks for a hug. Writes Obama:

I see my face, framed within
Pop’s black-framed glasses
And know he’s laughing too.

Wilkie offers a novel interpretation of “Pop.” Says Wilkie, “I think the poem zeros in on that poignant moment when Obama was told that his grandfather was in reality his father.”

Wilkie concedes his theory is “off-the-wall,” but he also offers photographic evidence to show that Obama much more closely resembles Dunham — especially by the telltale ears — than he does Barack Obama, Sr…..(rest of story at link below)

Source: American Thinker

h/t The Post & Email

*”But in the spirit of full disclosure, there are a few October surprises you’ll be finding out about in the coming weeks. First of all, my middle name is not what you think. It’s actually Steve. That’s right. Barack Steve Obama.”

(from remarks at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner; October 2008; video at 1:20)

What to Tell the Birthers Bashers by Mario Apuzzo

Note: This essay appeared yesterday (July 31, 2009) on Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s blog. Apuzzo represents Charles Kerchner and others in a suit filed Jan 20, 2009 against Barack Obama and the Congress; see Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al

You are poorly informed on the constitutional issue involved with Obama’s eligibility to be President. The primary issue is whether Obama is an Article II “natural born Citizen,” not whether he was born in the U.S. When drafting the eligibility requirements for the President, the Founding Fathers distinguished between “Citizen” and “natural born Citizen” in Article II, sec. 1, cl. 5 and in Articles I, III, and IV of the Constitution. Per the Founders, while Senators and Representatives can be just “citizens,” after 1789 the President must be a “natural born Citizen.” The Founders wanted to assure that the Office of President and Commander in Chief of the Military, a non-collegial and unique and powerful civil and military position, was free of all foreign influence and that its holder have sole and absolute allegiance, loyalty, and attachment to the U.S. The “natural born Citizen” clause was the best way for them to assure this….(read the rest)

“Birthers” Just Won’t Go Away: Day 188-July 28, 2009

Reporter Bill: Robert, I hate to bring this up but someone has to…
Gibbs: Uh Oh
R. Is there anything you can say that will make the “birthers” go away?
G. No!….that’s the God’s honest truth

Hawaii official asserts, again, that he has seen the original document that confirms Obama’s birthplace as Honolulu, and that he “is a natural born citizen”.
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”

Robert Gibbs,White House liar-in-chief keeps on giving:

Dr. Alan Keyes

Gibbs: It’s on the Internet Lester….

Chief Obama liar, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, laughed off a question from Lester Kinsolving about Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate. Claiming to be “astounded” at the question Gibbs said “You’re looking for the president’s birth certificate? It’s on the Internet, Lester.” “Long-form, listing his hospital and physician,” Kinsolving replied. (see video from Politico44)

Kinsolving made reference to the 400,000 plus names on a petition circulated by World Net Daily saying; “Why the president, who has pledged transparency in his administration, would not release his long-form birth certificate to establish his constitutional eligibility for office”. Spokesman Robert Gibbs then guffawed in unison with other members of the Washington press corps.

World Net Daily notes:

“It was the first time any member of the press corps has publicly asked a member of the administration a question directly related to Obama’s constitutional eligibility for office as a “natural born citizen.”
The “Certification of Live Birth” posted online and widely touted as “Obama’s birth certificate” does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same “short-form” document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true “long-form” birth certificate – which includes information like the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document
that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Broadcaster Les Kinsolving

1 Day or 1000-Obama Still a Usurper: Day 100 – April 30, 2009

Forget the One Hundred Days of Enchantment* Hype. Whether One Day, One Hundred Days, or A Thousand Days, Barack Obama Remains a Usurper in the White House Until He Proves his Constitutional Eligibility to Hold the Office of President of the United States. At Least He’s Not Bush the Lemmings Said, Give Him a Chance. In a Short Hundred Days He has Steered the Nation towards Moral, Political, and Financial Ruin.

Blogger Atomic Lib Smasher at The Conservative Dominion sums up  Obama’s 100 Daze:

It’s been one big turd sandwich, and the American people are refusing to eat another bite and say it’s delicious.

When the Anointed One had his Immaculate Innauguration address, he said Americans would have to accept sacrifice and responsibility. More do as I say, not as I do mentality of the Left. His inauguration was triple the cost of even George W. Bush’s inauguration in a time of economic downturn.

One of the first orders of business, close Gitmo and give terrorists detained there the same rights as Americans and open our courtrooms to these savages. Think Johnny Cochran would defend Khalid Sheik Mohammed? In Obama’s America, YES HE CAN!….

(continue reading here)

*More on the Enchantment business see Michell Malkin

Donofrio Explains Vattel: Day 57 – March 18, 2009

Attorney Leo C. Donofrio bows out of Obama eligibility struggle once again…. Explains the importance of Vattel’s definition of “Natural Born Citizen” and how Vattel’s theories influenced our framers…Donofrio to be on The Chalice Show radio program this evening…

Donofrio says on his blog today:

The case has been made as to the Constitutional process necessary to challenge President Obama’s qualifications for office. I call him President because he is President – under our Constitution – unless and until the District Court for the District of Columbia finds him ineligible. That is the only venue of review currently available under the law.

The case has also been thoroughly made that Obama is not a natural born citizen with regard to the presumption discussed in Marbury v. Madison by Chief Justice Marshall. That case stands for the nullification of the argument that one becomes eligible to be President through 14th Amendment citizenship (if born in the US). Chief Justice Marshall has spoken from the grave on this issue, and he holds that such a construction is “inadmissible”….

Donofrio can be heard on The Chalice Show radio program this evening and he says this will be the last we’ll be hearing from him for some time! The Chalice Show program notes give the following details:

On Wednesday, March 18 from 8-10 CDT, The Chalice Show will air on Patriot’s Heart Network. The special guest will be Leo Donofrio. He will discuss the technical legal aspects of the quo warranto statute as it applies to the Obama presidential eligibility controversy. He will also discuss breaking updates on the natural born citizen controversy. Please review Mr. Donofrio’s blog for complete background on these important issues.

Please tune in. Mr. Donofrio will be on for the entire 2 hours. To ask a question or discuss the issue with Leo and Chalice, the call-in number is (347) 215-6929.

Donofrio concludes his post with a plea for citizen action; Take a Stand he says:

Unless you make EVERY effort to be heard then you will never know if justice was at your fingertips. How much do you believe in this issue? Back in the 60’s when civil rights were being denied, the people came to Washington… a million man march. The law was changed and history with it. There is power available to you. Stop being so defeated. Stop depending on charlatans. Use your mind. Think for yourself. Don’t believe Leo Donofrio. Do your damn homework. I have provided you with the research materials. Use them.

If you don’t have the support of the people, the Government will not listen. You need to assemble peacefully and be heard. If you don’t have the numbers, you won’t be heard. It’s that simple. Go get the people. Bring them to Washington DC. Be heard.

Stay tuned!

Swiss Political Theorist E. Vattel

By What Warrant? (Quo Warranto): Day 45 – March 4, 2009

Leo Donofrio: Our Military Need Not Take on Obama Eligibility Challenge Burden. A New Approach Involving Non-Military Plaintiffs Seen as Key. Donofrio to Work with Atty Mario Apuzzo to Cooperate in New Effort. The Problem of Legal Standing has Stymied Earlier Efforts but it is Thought Civilian Plaintiffs Can Meet Test of Standing.

The ancient common law writ of Quo Warranto (Latin: By What Warrant?) at one time… functioned as a court order (or “writ”) to show proof of authority; for example, demanding that someone acting as the sheriff prove that the king had actually appointed him to that office (literally, “By whose warrant are you the sheriff?”). (Source: Wikipedia)

In the United States today..The common law writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level… and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.(Source)

Writing at Natural Born Citizen today, Leo Donofrio announces, in a very public way, his decision to work with New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo to further challenge Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President. Using the above referenced tactic of Quo Warranto they hope to avoid the usually fatal error of lack of standing of various plaintiffs in previous actions. *Standing is described at one source as:

…the legal right to initiate a lawsuit. To do so, a person must be sufficiently affected by the matter at hand, and there must be a case or controversy that can be resolved by legal action.

The establishment of standing has been the stumbling block so far, and with respect to the military plaintiffs, their speaking out has brought the possibility of courts martial. The new approach by Donofrio and Apuzzo is designed to involve civilian plaintiffs who can, one hopes, show the necessary standing. This must sound hopelessly obscure to the layperson, and I am surely one of those. Donofrio lays out his explanation for this new course and one must go to his blog for a fuller explanation. About the situation for military plaintiffs, many of whom are involved with the Orly Tait action, Donofrio says:

If you are an active military person who is thinking of joining an action in Quo Warranto, please refrain form doing so until you have read the pending brief I will publish here.

Attorney Apuzzo and I will be working together on this public awareness campaign. I am very encouraged to have found another attorney who lives near me and who I believe in. I was very impressed by his intellect as to the various nuances of this intricate field of law. I believe we will both learn from each other and together provide a more powerful perspective and education to the public as well as presenting the best possible pro bono legal action on behalf of any potential plaintiffs.

*there are three requirements for Article III standing: (1)injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a)concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative.

A lengthy and informative study of constitutional standing by Stephen L. Winter, titled “The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance” (1987) may be read here.

[C]onstitutional standing [is] … a word game played by secret rules…. Characterized neither by the private rights model of the seven common law forms of action nor by the “injury-in-fact” paradigm of modern standing doctrine, these matters took forms astonishingly similar to the “standingless” public action or “private attorney general” model that modern standing law is designed to thwart..

Eligibility Movement About Love Not Hate: Day 43 – March2, 2009

….that’s Love as in Love of Country and Reverence for Our Constitution, NOT Hatred for Barack Obama. The Left is attempting to smear those concerned about Obama’s eligibility as irrational conspiracy theorists. They are So Wrong! The Issue is not going away; Today’s AOL and Politico Headline the story…

AOL News: The Birthers Continue to Hound Obama
The Politico: Culture of Conspiracy. The Birthers

At The Politico Ben Smith writes:

Out of the gaze of the mainstream and even the conservative media is a flourishing culture of advocates, theorists and lawyers, all devoted to proving that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president of the United States…..The challenges to Obama’s eligibility have no grounding in evidence. Courts across the country have summarily rejected the movement’s theory — that Obama can’t be a citizen because his father wasn’t —as a misreading of U.S. law; and Hawaii officials, along with contemporary birth announcements, affirm that Obama was in fact born in Honolulu in 1961.

The issue is hardly out of the gaze of the mainstream…media, it has been in plain sight all along. But the mainstream, and most of the conservative, media have chosen to ignore the most severe constitutional crisis since the Civil War. We must mark 2008 as the year journalism in the United States died. The press has become, in the words of Leo Donofrio, The Propaganda Ponies of the Fourth Estate.

At the time of his birth, Obama was a British/Kenyan citizen by descent of his father. Because I pointed out pesky international laws which governed his citizenship due to the fact that a father has every legal right in the world to have the laws of his nation apply to his son, I have been labeled a conspiracy freakoid of nature.

Never mind that I included demands for Panama John McCain and the Nicaraguan born Roger Calero to also be removed from our ballots. No, they don’t want to talk about that do they – because it would blow the “he’s just another Obama hater” mantra clear out of play. (see Natural Born Citizen)

So much for the mainstream media.Most of the conservative media will not touch the eligibility issue because they fear being smeared as kooks and nut cases. Some Republicans are so desperate to find a suitable candidate to revive the party’s fortunes that they wish the natural born citizen requirement would go away so they can nominate a non natural born citizen; i.e. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal; born of Indian immigrant parents who naturalized after his birth. Governor Schwarzenegger, who would love to be President, at least had the good sense to acknowledge that he is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible unless, and until, a constitutional amendment is passed negating the natural born citizen requirement of our Presidents.

The eligibility issue did come up, albeit briefly, at the past weekend’s CPAC gathering in Washington. Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media:

Judging by the applause, a large portion of the audience was not outraged by the remarks.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President...and the President before taking office swears the following oath…“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” (U.S.Constitution, Article II, Section 2)

Barack Obama taking oath; Michelle Obama holding Lincoln bible..